LSU Football BREAKING NEWS: Two New NCAA Rule Changes that helps BRIAN KELLY



The college football world was shook when the NCAA announced two new rule changes, both of which help LSU Football’s new regime under Brian Kelly!

Brian Kelly’s Championship Year is 2023:

____________________________________________

Subscribe to Power Hour LSU!

PHL Football Newsletter:

PHL on Twitter:

LSU Chapters
0:00 College Football Rule Changes
0:26 Scholarship Limits
3:11 Divisions
7:51 Pod System Projection
9:05 Mock LSU Schedule
11:35 Dinner?

#LSUFootball #BrianKelly #CollegeFootball

Camisetas Orlando City Todas las noticias sobre Fútbol publicadas en EL PAÍS. Información, novedades y última hora sobre Fútbol.

17 comentarios en «LSU Football BREAKING NEWS: Two New NCAA Rule Changes that helps BRIAN KELLY»

  1. Notice of Allegations against the LSU athletic department has officially been released by the NCAA and includes the dreaded words "lack of institutional control." The NCAA sanctions should be very damaging to LSU and Kelly. The disgusting Title IX violations that got Miles and Orgeron fired from LSU should be even worse. LSU can only win by cheating while the NCAA looks the other way.

  2. I disagree, LSU having the hardest schedule (8 top 25 teams out 15 games) is one of my favorite arguments for why 2019 LSU was the best team in college football history. Having the odds against us in terms of schedule played in our favor that year and I’d like to keep that.

  3. I think Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma and Missouri
    Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Mississippi St makes more sense.
    You revive the Texas vs Texas A&M, Oklahoma vs Missouri and maintain the Red River rivalries. You maintain the LSU vs Ole Miss, LSUvs Arkansas and The Egg Bowl rivalries. Make no mistake about SEC are gonna want to have as many of those natural rivalries as possible because of the almighty dollar. They are gonna have to produce some positives because overall this was not a popular move among college football purist. I for one was still hating the admittance of A&M and Missouri now you bring in Texas and Oklahoma?? Those four team do not belong in the SEC and you will never make me and a lot of others feel any different. There were other schools that fit the bill better, Florida St, Clemson, Georgia Tech, Louisville just for a few. It's all about money, and Greg Sankey basically pulled a bullshit power move in saying this is what is gonna happen and every University is gonna support it. Now the traditions and landscape of this historical conference are forever altered.

  4. Idk how I feel about this. Obviously the current way it's done isn't at all perfect, but I don't want to live in a world where we're not playing Alabama, Florida, Auburn, AtM and Ole Miss every year. These yearly rivalries are what make the sport great, even if it makes for some tough years.

  5. It would be cool if the winner of Southwest played the winner of northwest and the winner of northeast played the winner of southeast. And then the winner of those games plays in the sec championship. So like an SEC playoff

  6. I like the idea behind the pod scheduling system now that you show me what it looks like. It's consistent and fair. I believe it will help us and also the other teams you mentioned who have to play the same cross rival every year. I'm curious if they would consider the strength of schedule when picking the number 1 and the number 2 team for the conference championship or if they would go strictly by their records. There will be complaints either way, I guess.

  7. I kind of see what Texas in Oklahoma are doing this but they could also be hurting themselves because you're going to have 12 teams in the playoffs but not everybody from one conference is going to be in the playoffs just going to be teams from the Big 12 the Big 10 the back 12 in the ACC as well as the SEC if you have a good enough record and there's 12 slots and you know you got a unique team you're going to make it no matter what conference you're in unless you're in the mountain West or wanted a smaller conferences

Los comentarios están cerrados.